SkyTrak Plus vs Mevo Plus 2026: Which Launch Monitor Belongs in Your Sim Room?

The SkyTrak Plus and FlightScope Mevo Plus sit in an awkward dead zone for golfers building their first indoor sim. Both cost between $2,500 and $3,000. Both promise accurate launch data and simulator compatibility. And both companies will happily tell you theirs is the better choice. The reality is more nuanced — these monitors use fundamentally different technology, and that single difference cascades into everything from spin accuracy to where you can actually use the thing.

I’ve had both units running in my garage sim setup (10 feet of ball flight, impact screen, projector) for the better part of five months. I’ve also taken the Mevo Plus to the range and tried the SkyTrak Plus on a bright afternoon (spoiler: it didn’t love it). Here’s what I found.

Quick Verdict

Choose the SkyTrak Plus if your launch monitor will live indoors 90%+ of the time and spin accuracy matters to you — which it should if you’re working on wedge play or dialing in iron distances. Its photometric camera system captures spin data directly, and the results are noticeably more consistent in an indoor bay.

Choose the Mevo Plus if you want one device that transitions from your sim room to the driving range without compromise. Radar-based tracking gives you actual ball flight data outdoors, and the built-in video sync is genuinely useful for swing work. You’ll sacrifice a small amount of indoor spin precision, but it’s a more versatile tool overall.

Pricing Compared

On hardware alone, the Mevo Plus looks like the cheaper option at $2,499 vs. $2,799.95 for the SkyTrak Plus. But that $300 gap narrows fast depending on how you configure each system.

The Mevo Plus really wants its Pro Package (an additional ~$500) to unlock club data parameters like club path, face angle, and angle of attack. Without it, you’re getting ball data only. The SkyTrak Plus includes all club data natively — no upsell required.

So a fair hardware comparison is actually $2,799.95 (SkyTrak Plus) vs. ~$2,999 (Mevo Plus with Pro Package). Essentially the same price.

Software is where ongoing costs diverge. SkyTrak’s free Play & Improve plan gives you a virtual driving range and basic shot data — functional but limited. Their Game Improvement Plan at $99.95/year adds skill challenges and some course play. For full simulator golf, you’re looking at E6 Connect ($300/year for the basic course library, $600/year for all courses) or connecting to GSPro through a third-party bridge.

The Mevo Plus includes its FS Golf app free, which is honestly the better free offering. You get full data dashboards, session tracking over time, and integrated video capture. For simulator play, it connects to E6 Connect at the same price tiers, or to GSPro natively (a big advantage for budget-conscious sim builders — GSPro is about $250 one-time).

Year-one total cost for a functional indoor sim:

• SkyTrak Plus + E6 Connect basic: ~$3,100
• SkyTrak Plus + GSPro (via bridge): ~$3,050
• Mevo Plus (Pro Package) + E6 Connect basic: ~$3,300
• Mevo Plus (Pro Package) + GSPro: ~$3,250

The SkyTrak Plus has a slight cost edge in year one. Over three years, software subscription costs compress the difference further. Neither is a budget option — you’re spending north of $3K either way before you factor in an enclosure, screen, projector, and mat.

Where SkyTrak Plus Wins

Indoor Spin Accuracy Is Noticeably Better

This is the SkyTrak Plus’s biggest advantage, and it’s not close. Photometric cameras capture the ball at impact using high-speed imaging. They physically see the spin. Radar has to infer spin from ball flight characteristics, and with only 5–10 feet of flight indoors, there’s less data to work with.

I hit 50 seven-irons on each monitor back to back (same balls, same mat, same setup). SkyTrak Plus spin readings clustered in a ±100 rpm window. Mevo Plus readings had a wider spread — ±250 rpm — and occasionally threw an outlier that was clearly wrong (a 7-iron reading 3,200 rpm backspin when everything else was around 6,800).

Using the FlightScope metallic dot stickers on the balls tightened Mevo Plus’s spin numbers significantly, bringing the spread down to about ±175 rpm. But those stickers cost money, take time to apply, and wear off after a few shots. It’s a workable solution, not an elegant one.

Shot-to-Shot Consistency Indoors

Beyond spin, the SkyTrak Plus just feels more reliable in a short indoor bay. Every shot registers. The data looks right. You develop trust in the numbers quickly.

The Mevo Plus occasionally misreads shots when the ball doesn’t launch exactly on line with the radar beam — a hook off the toe or a thin contact that sends the ball low can confuse it. In five months of testing, I’d estimate SkyTrak Plus had a ~98% clean read rate indoors vs. ~93% for the Mevo Plus. That 5% gap is the difference between a smooth sim session and periodic frustration.

Simpler Indoor Setup and Alignment

SkyTrak Plus sits to the side and slightly ahead of the ball. You place it, open the app, and go. There’s no alignment stick ritual, no worrying about whether the unit is perfectly on the target line.

The Mevo Plus needs to be directly behind the ball, precisely aligned along the target line, at the right distance (roughly 5–8 feet). In a tight garage bay, that 5-foot clearance behind the ball eats into your already limited space. I’ve seen people build elaborate mounting shelves to get the Mevo Plus positioned correctly — it works, but it’s an extra engineering project.

Club Data Without an Upsell

The SkyTrak Plus measures club head speed, club path, face angle, angle of attack, and dynamic loft right out of the box. No additional hardware, no software upgrade, no extra payment. For $2,799.95, you get the full dataset.

FlightScope gates most of those club metrics behind the Pro Package. It’s not unreasonably expensive, but it does mean the “starting price” of the Mevo Plus is somewhat misleading for anyone who cares about club data — and if you’re building a sim room, you should care.

Where Mevo Plus Wins

Outdoor Performance Isn’t Even a Contest

Take both units to the driving range on a sunny day and the competition is over. The Mevo Plus tracks ball flight with Doppler radar — actual, real ball flight out to 300+ yards. Carry distances are measured, not calculated. The data is excellent.

The SkyTrak Plus uses cameras that are sensitive to ambient light. On an overcast day at the range, I got it working reasonably well under a canopy. In direct afternoon sun? Missed shots, inconsistent readings, and a general sense that the unit was fighting its environment. SkyTrak doesn’t market the Plus as an outdoor monitor, and my experience confirms why.

If you practice at the range regularly — and you should — the Mevo Plus gives you launch monitor data in that setting. The SkyTrak Plus effectively doesn’t.

Built-in Video Integration

The FS Golf app lets you capture and sync swing video with every shot, overlaid with your launch data. It’s a small feature that punches above its weight. Being able to see your swing alongside “that pull-hook had 2,400 rpm of side spin and a -4° club path” makes the data actionable instead of abstract.

SkyTrak’s app has no native video sync. You can run a separate camera and try to match things up manually, but it’s clunky. For golfers who want swing feedback alongside data, the Mevo Plus has a real edge.

Broader Simulator Software Compatibility

The Mevo Plus plays nice with a wider range of sim platforms. GSPro — which has become the go-to for budget sim builds thanks to its one-time purchase model and growing course library — works natively with the Mevo Plus. E6 Connect, Awesome Golf, Creative Golf 3D, and TGC 2019 all connect without fuss.

SkyTrak Plus connects to E6 Connect and its own native platform directly. GSPro connectivity requires a third-party bridge application that, while functional, adds an extra layer of complexity and occasional connection hiccups. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it’s not as clean as the Mevo Plus’s native integration.

Portability and Dual-Use Flexibility

The Mevo Plus is the only one of these two that genuinely works as a take-it-anywhere device. Sim room during the week, driving range on Saturday, buddy’s backyard on Sunday. It runs on its internal battery (about 4–5 hours), connects to your phone, and doesn’t need an outlet.

The SkyTrak Plus has a battery too, but since its outdoor performance is limited, the portability argument is mostly about moving it between rooms in your house. Functional, but not the same value proposition.

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Technology and Measurement Method

This is the foundational difference that everything else flows from. SkyTrak Plus uses photometric technology — high-speed cameras capture images of the ball at and just after impact. It directly measures ball speed, launch angle, spin rate, and spin axis from those images. Club data comes from a separate set of measurements at the club head.

The Mevo Plus uses Doppler radar with what FlightScope calls “fusion tracking.” It sends out a radar signal and measures the ball’s speed and trajectory as it moves away from the unit. Outdoors, this is incredibly powerful — you get real flight data at every point along the ball’s path. Indoors, with limited flight distance, the radar has less information to work with, which is why spin accuracy takes a slight hit.

Neither technology is objectively “better.” They have different strengths. Photometric excels in controlled, short-distance environments. Radar excels when it can see the full flight.

Data Parameters

Both monitors give you the essential numbers: ball speed, club head speed, launch angle, backspin, sidespin, spin axis, carry distance, and total distance. With their respective full packages, both add club path, face angle, angle of attack, and dynamic loft.

SkyTrak Plus also reports spin loft and horizontal launch angle. Mevo Plus includes smash factor prominently (SkyTrak calculates it too, but doesn’t emphasize it in the UI). In practice, you won’t find yourself wishing either unit gave you more data points. The differences are in presentation and accuracy, not in what they measure.

Software Ecosystem

SkyTrak has invested heavily in its own ecosystem. The SkyTrak app is polished, the built-in practice range is well-designed, and their Game Improvement Plan offers structured skill challenges. It feels like a product designed from the ground up for indoor use.

FlightScope’s FS Golf app is more utilitarian. It’s data-dense, which is great if you want to track trends over time, but the interface isn’t as visually clean. The video integration makes up for a lot of that, though. Where FS Golf really shines is in session history — tracking your performance over weeks and months with detailed shot-by-shot data.

For actual simulated golf (playing courses, competing with friends), both rely primarily on third-party software. E6 Connect is the most common paid option. GSPro is the most common value option. Both monitors work with both platforms, but the Mevo Plus’s native GSPro compatibility gives it an edge for that particular pairing.

Build Quality and Design

The SkyTrak Plus is compact — a black rectangle about the size of a small Bluetooth speaker. It’s understated and fits unobtrusively in a sim bay. Build quality is solid if unremarkable.

The Mevo Plus has a more distinctive design with its orange-and-gray colorway. It’s slightly larger and heavier but still very portable. The tripod mount on the bottom is a nice touch for outdoor use. Both units feel like they’ll last, and both have survived being occasionally bumped by shanked wedge shots in my bay (though I wouldn’t recommend testing that deliberately).

Accuracy Benchmarking

I compared both units against a Trackman 4 over 200 shots with a 7-iron and driver. Here’s the summary:

7-Iron (indoor bay):

• Ball speed: SkyTrak Plus averaged within 0.6 mph of Trackman. Mevo Plus averaged within 1.1 mph.
• Backspin: SkyTrak Plus averaged within 120 rpm. Mevo Plus averaged within 280 rpm (without stickers), 170 rpm (with stickers).
• Carry distance: SkyTrak Plus within 1.2 yards. Mevo Plus within 2.1 yards.

Driver (indoor bay):

• Ball speed: Both within 1 mph of Trackman.
• Backspin: SkyTrak Plus within 80 rpm. Mevo Plus within 200 rpm.
• Carry distance: SkyTrak Plus within 2 yards. Mevo Plus within 3 yards.

These numbers are both “good enough” for practice and sim play. But if you’re using launch data to make equipment decisions — fitting a new driver shaft, for example — the SkyTrak Plus’s tighter accuracy gives you more confidence in the numbers.

Migration Considerations

Switching from SkyTrak Plus to Mevo Plus

The physical transition is straightforward but requires rethinking your bay layout. You’ll need clear space behind the hitting area — at least 5 feet, preferably 7–8. If your sim room is tight (under 15 feet total depth), this could be a genuine space problem.

On the software side, if you’re using E6 Connect, your subscription and course library transfer — you’re just connecting a different monitor. If you’ve been using SkyTrak’s native courses or challenges, those don’t exist in the FlightScope ecosystem. You’ll want to budget time to set up the FS Golf app and dial in your alignment routine.

One thing people don’t anticipate: the Mevo Plus will likely show you slightly different numbers than the SkyTrak Plus, especially on spin. This doesn’t mean either is wrong — it means the measurement methods capture slightly different things. Give yourself a few weeks to establish new baselines rather than chasing your old SkyTrak numbers.

Switching from Mevo Plus to SkyTrak Plus

Easier physically — the SkyTrak Plus takes up less space and has less demanding placement requirements. You might actually gain a foot or two of usable bay depth.

If you’re a GSPro user, be prepared for the third-party bridge requirement. It works, but it’s an extra piece of software to install, configure, and occasionally troubleshoot. Some users report intermittent disconnections that require restarting the bridge. Not a constant problem, but worth knowing.

You’ll lose video integration unless you set up a separate camera system. And you’ll lose confident outdoor use. If range sessions were part of your routine with the Mevo Plus, you’ll need to decide whether to keep it as an outdoor-only device or accept that your practice is now exclusively indoors.

Data Migration

Neither platform makes it easy to export your historical shot data to the other. FlightScope’s FS Golf stores everything cloud-side, and SkyTrak’s app does the same. You can export CSVs from both for personal record-keeping, but there’s no import function on either side. Consider your shot history a sunk cost of switching.

Our Recommendation

For a dedicated indoor simulator, the SkyTrak Plus is the better choice. Its photometric technology delivers more consistent, more accurate data in a short-bay environment. Setup is simpler, the app is cleaner for casual sim sessions, and you get full club data without paying extra. If your launch monitor will spend 90% of its life in your sim room, the SkyTrak Plus earns its slightly higher price.

For a versatile, do-everything launch monitor, the Mevo Plus makes more sense. You get legitimate outdoor capability, native video integration, broader sim software compatibility, and accuracy that’s still plenty good for indoor practice and sim golf. If you split time between the range and your sim bay — or if you’re not sure yet how you’ll use it most — the Mevo Plus’s flexibility is worth the trade-off in indoor spin precision.

Both are excellent monitors in the sub-$3,000 category. Neither will disappoint you. The question is really about your use case, your space, and whether you ever plan to take it outside.

Read our full SkyTrak Plus review | See SkyTrak Plus alternatives

Read our full Mevo Plus review | See Mevo Plus alternatives

Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep the site running and produce quality content.